Barry Bluefeld v. Barry Cohen

Filing

AMENDED OPINION filed amending and superseding opinion dated February 27, 2017. Originating case number: 8:15-cv-02857-PX. Copies to all parties. [16-2386]

Appeal: 16-2386

Doc: 20

Filed: 04/05/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2386

BARRY J. BLUEFELD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BARRY S. COHEN; JOEL S. MEISEL; DAVID COHEN,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:15-cv02857-PX)

Submitted:

February 23, 2017
Amended:

Decided:

February 27, 2017

April 5, 2017

Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barry J. Bluefeld, Appellant Pro Se.
Matthew D. Matkov, SALTZ
MATKOV PC, Wayne, Pennsylvania; Albert Sanford Nalibotsky, SALTZ
MATKOV, PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-2386

Doc: 20

Filed: 04/05/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Barry
orders:

J.

(1)

Bluefeld

denying

seeks

his

to

motion

appeal
for

the

leave

district
to

file

a

court’s
second

amended complaint; (2) denying his motion for an extension of
time,

and

(3)

confidentiality

granting

order.

the

This

Appellees’

court

may

motion

exercise

for

a

jurisdiction

only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
is

neither

a

final

order

The order Bluefeld seeks to appeal

nor

an

appealable

interlocutory

or

collateral order.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack

of jurisdiction.

We dispense with oral argument because the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.
DISMISSED

2