Barry Bluefeld v. Barry Cohen


AMENDED OPINION filed amending and superseding opinion dated February 27, 2017. Originating case number: 8:15-cv-02857-PX. Copies to all parties. [16-2386]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-2386 Doc: 20 Filed: 04/05/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2386 BARRY J. BLUEFELD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BARRY S. COHEN; JOEL S. MEISEL; DAVID COHEN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:15-cv02857-PX) Submitted: February 23, 2017 Amended: Decided: February 27, 2017 April 5, 2017 Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Barry J. Bluefeld, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew D. Matkov, SALTZ MATKOV PC, Wayne, Pennsylvania; Albert Sanford Nalibotsky, SALTZ MATKOV, PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-2386 Doc: 20 Filed: 04/05/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Barry orders: J. (1) Bluefeld denying seeks his to motion appeal for the leave district to file a court’s second amended complaint; (2) denying his motion for an extension of time, and (3) confidentiality granting order. the This Appellees’ court may motion exercise for a jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). is neither a final order The order Bluefeld seeks to appeal nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and materials legal before contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?