Martin Rugamba v. Rockledge Bus (Tour), Inc.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-03948-GLR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000130641]. Mailed to: Martin Rugamba. [16-2391]

Appeal: 16-2391

Doc: 5

Filed: 08/03/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2391

MARTIN RUGAMBA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROCKLEDGE BUS (TOUR), INC.; ROCKLEDGE BUS (TOUR) INC.
SUPERVISOR; MTA POLICE OFFICER 1; MTA POLICE OFFICER 2; MTA
BUS DRIVER; MTA TRAIN OPERATOR; AMTRAK 3 UNKNOWN AGENTS;
7-ELEVEN; 7-ELEVEN, INC. 2 Unknown Employees; DOES 1-20,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:15-cv-03948-GLR)

Submitted: July 27, 2017

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Martin Rugamba, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Decided: August 3, 2017

Appeal: 16-2391

Doc: 5

Filed: 08/03/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Martin Rugamba appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen
his case and file an amended complaint. We dismissed Rugamba’s prior appeal for lack
of jurisdiction “[b]ecause the deficiencies identified by the district court may be remedied
by the filing of an amended complaint.” Rugamba v. Rockledge Bus (Tour), Inc., 667 F.
App’x 61, 61 (4th Cir. 2016) (No. 16-1076) (emphasis added). Because the district court
did not permit Rugamba to file an amended complaint, we vacate the district court’s
order denying the motion to reopen and remand with instructions to permit Rugamba to
do so. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED

2