William Davis, II v. Unknown

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to show cause [1000049514-2]; denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000022741-2]; denying Motion to vacate [1000000749-2] Originating case number: 2:16-cv-00563-MSD-RJK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000054248]. Mailed to: William Davis. [16-2393]

Appeal: 16-2393

Doc: 14

Filed: 04/03/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2393

WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNKNOWN,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:16-cv-00563-MSD-RJK)

Submitted:

March 30, 2017

Decided:

April 3, 2017

Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Scott Davis, II, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-2393

Doc: 14

Filed: 04/03/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
William Scott Davis, II, appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil rights action for failure to state a claim
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2012).
find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the record and

Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed

in forma pauperis, deny Davis’ motions to vacate and for order
to show cause, and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by
the district court.
(E.D.

Va.

Oct.

14,

Davis v. Unknown, No. 2:16−cv−00563−MSD−RJK
2016).

We

dispense

with

oral

argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2