Cedric D. Jacobs v. UPS


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999992994-2], granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999985347-2] Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00381-GCM. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000078244]. Mailed to: Cedric D. Jacobs. [16-2401]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-2401 Doc: 17 Filed: 05/09/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2401 CEDRIC D. JACOBS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:15-cv-00381-GCM) Submitted: April 26, 2017 Decided: May 9, 2017 Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cedric D. Jacobs, Appellant Pro Se. Alexandra Garrison Barnett, Glenn G. Patton, ALSTON & BIRD, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia; Susan Ballantine Molony, ALSTON & BIRD, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-2401 Doc: 17 Filed: 05/09/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Cedric D. Jacobs appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jacobs v. United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 3:15-cv-00381-GCM (W.D.N.C. Dec. 5, 2016). We grant Jacobs leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?