In Re: Nathanael Reynold
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for response [1000003553-2]; denying Motion for extraordinary writ under FRAP 21 [999994413-2], denying Motion for extraordinary writ under FRAP 21 [999987868-2], denying Motion for extraordinary writ under FRAP 21 [999986035-2] Originating case number: 2:16-cv-00512-BHH-MGB Copies to all parties and the district court. . Mailed to: Nathanael Reynolds. [16-2407]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
In Re: NATHANAEL LENARD REYNOLDS,
On Petition for Extraordinary Writ.
Submitted: March 20, 2017
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathanael Lenard Reynolds, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Decided: March 23, 2017
Pg: 2 of 2
Nathanael Lenard Reynolds filed a petition and supplements thereto seeking
transfer of a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action to “the Supreme Court of the District.”
Although he alleges that he cannot receive an impartial hearing in the district court,
Reynolds’ conclusory allegations do not establish grounds for disqualification.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for transfer. We deny the motion for response and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?