Patricia Leviege v. Vodafone US Inc.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00374-LMB-IDD. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000087902]. [16-2413]

Appeal: 16-2413

Doc: 18

Filed: 05/25/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2413

PATRICIA LEVIEGE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VODAFONE US INC., d/b/a Vodafone Americas,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00374-LMB-IDD)

Submitted: May 23, 2017

Decided: May 25, 2017

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Monique Antonia Miles, OLD TOWNE ASSOCIATES, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellant. Emily Crandall Harlan, NIXON PEABODY LLP, Washington, D.C., for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-2413

Doc: 18

Filed: 05/25/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Patricia Leviege appeals the district court’s orders granting Vodafone US Inc.’s
(Vodafone) motion to dismiss Leviege’s employment discrimination, harassment, and
retaliation claims against Vodafone, and denying Leviege’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion
for reconsideration of the dismissal order. We have considered the parties’ arguments
and have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Leviege v. Vodafone US Inc., No. 1:16-cv00374-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 4, 2016 & Nov. 9, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2