Patricia Leviege v. Vodafone US Inc.
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00374-LMB-IDD. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . [16-2413]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
VODAFONE US INC., d/b/a Vodafone Americas,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00374-LMB-IDD)
Submitted: May 23, 2017
Decided: May 25, 2017
Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Monique Antonia Miles, OLD TOWNE ASSOCIATES, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellant. Emily Crandall Harlan, NIXON PEABODY LLP, Washington, D.C., for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Patricia Leviege appeals the district court’s orders granting Vodafone US Inc.’s
(Vodafone) motion to dismiss Leviege’s employment discrimination, harassment, and
retaliation claims against Vodafone, and denying Leviege’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion
for reconsideration of the dismissal order. We have considered the parties’ arguments
and have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Leviege v. Vodafone US Inc., No. 1:16-cv00374-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 4, 2016 & Nov. 9, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?