Maurice Jenkins v. Mid Atlantic Detailing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00188-REP. Copies to all parties and the district court . Mailed to: Maurice Jenkins. [16-2415]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
MID ATLANTIC DETAILING, now known as National Automotive Charging
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:16-cv-00188-REP)
Submitted: April 28, 2017
Decided: May 12, 2017
Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Maurice Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Davis, Elizabeth Scott Turner,
SPOTTS FAIN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Maurice Jenkins appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment and
dismissing his complaint, which raised state and federal claims regarding wrongful
termination, employment discrimination, and related allegations. On appeal, we confine
our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because
Jenkins’ informal brief discusses only the merits of his state law claims, over which the
district court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, he does not challenge the
basis for the district court’s disposition. Thus, Jenkins has forfeited appellate review of
the district court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th
Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?