In re: Arkadiy Bangiyev


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [1000001103-2], denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999992346-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cr-00206-LO-5 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000026746]. Mailed to: Arkadiy Bangiyev. [16-2438]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-2438 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/21/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2438 In re: ARKADIY BANGIYEV, a/k/a Alex, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus (1:14-cr-00206-LO-5) Submitted: February 16, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Decided: DUNCAN, February 21, 2017 Circuit Judge, and Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arkadiy Bangiyev, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-2438 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/21/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Arkadiy Bangiyev petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion requesting that certain evidence be produced related to his pending 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny corrected mandamus petition. the mandamus petition and the We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?