In re: Arkadiy Bangiyev
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [1000001103-2], denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999992346-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cr-00206-LO-5 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000026746]. Mailed to: Arkadiy Bangiyev. [16-2438]
Appeal: 16-2438
Doc: 8
Filed: 02/21/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2438
In re:
ARKADIY BANGIYEV, a/k/a Alex,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(1:14-cr-00206-LO-5)
Submitted:
February 16, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge,
HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Decided:
DUNCAN,
February 21, 2017
Circuit
Judge,
and
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arkadiy Bangiyev, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-2438
Doc: 8
Filed: 02/21/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Arkadiy Bangiyev petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging
that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his
motion requesting that certain evidence be produced related to
his pending 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 (2012) motion.
He seeks an order
from this court directing the district court to act.
We find
the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district
court.
Accordingly,
we
deny
corrected mandamus petition.
the
mandamus
petition
and
the
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?