Rhonda Meisner v. ZymoGenetics, Inc.
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion for leave to file [1000035201-3]; [1000035201-2] Originating case number: 3:15-cv-03523-CMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Rhonda Meisner. [16-2443]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
ZYMOGENETICS, INC., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bristol Myers Squibb, Inc.;
ZYMOGENETICS, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Zymogenetics, Inc.;
BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB, INC.; TRACEY CALDARAZZO; JEFF FORTINO;
STEPHANIE LEWIS, individually and as a member of Jackson Lewis, PC,
Greenville; JACKSON LEWIS, LLP, Greenville; JACKSON LEWIS PC; JOHN
DOES AND JANE DOES 1-10, (Whose name is unknown or as yet discovered),
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:15-cv-03523-CMC)
Submitted: September 7, 2017
Decided: September 20, 2017
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rhonda Meisner, Appellant Pro Se. Ellison F. McCoy, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Greenville,
South Carolina, for Appellees.
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
Rhonda Meisner appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and denying her motion to remand, denying her motion to recuse
and for reconsideration, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss, denying her motion to alter or amend the
judgment, and taxing costs. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we grant Meisner’s motion to file a corrected informal opening brief and
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Meisner v. ZymoGenetics, Inc., No. 3:15cv-03523-CMC (D.S.C. Apr. 7, 2016; June 1, 2016; July 27, 2016; Sept. 15, 2016 & Nov.
28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?