Rhonda Meisner v. ZymoGenetics, Inc.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion for leave to file [1000035201-3]; [1000035201-2] Originating case number: 3:15-cv-03523-CMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000158834]. Mailed to: Rhonda Meisner. [16-2443]

Appeal: 16-2443

Doc: 18

Filed: 09/20/2017

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2443

RHONDA MEISNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ZYMOGENETICS, INC., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bristol Myers Squibb, Inc.;
ZYMOGENETICS, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Zymogenetics, Inc.;
BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB, INC.; TRACEY CALDARAZZO; JEFF FORTINO;
STEPHANIE LEWIS, individually and as a member of Jackson Lewis, PC,
Greenville; JACKSON LEWIS, LLP, Greenville; JACKSON LEWIS PC; JOHN
DOES AND JANE DOES 1-10, (Whose name is unknown or as yet discovered),
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:15-cv-03523-CMC)

Submitted: September 7, 2017

Decided: September 20, 2017

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rhonda Meisner, Appellant Pro Se. Ellison F. McCoy, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Greenville,
South Carolina, for Appellees.

Appeal: 16-2443

Doc: 18

Filed: 09/20/2017

Pg: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 16-2443

Doc: 18

Filed: 09/20/2017

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Rhonda Meisner appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and denying her motion to remand, denying her motion to recuse
and for reconsideration, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss, denying her motion to alter or amend the
judgment, and taxing costs. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we grant Meisner’s motion to file a corrected informal opening brief and
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Meisner v. ZymoGenetics, Inc., No. 3:15cv-03523-CMC (D.S.C. Apr. 7, 2016; June 1, 2016; July 27, 2016; Sept. 15, 2016 & Nov.
28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3