US v. Laquan Wilson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:15-cr-00071-RJC-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000043308].. [16-4452]
Appeal: 16-4452
Doc: 31
Filed: 03/16/2017
Pg: 1 of 4
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-4452
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
LAQUAN MARCELL WILSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., District Judge. (3:15-cr-00071-RJC-1)
Submitted:
March 14, 2017
Before FLOYD and
Circuit Judge.
HARRIS,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
March 16, 2017
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Parke Davis, Acting Executive Director, Ann L. Hester,
FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Charlotte,
North Carolina, for Appellant. Jill Westmoreland Rose, United
States Attorney, Anthony J. Enright, Assistant United States
Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-4452
Doc: 31
Filed: 03/16/2017
Pg: 2 of 4
PER CURIAM:
Laquan Marcell Wilson appeals from the 84-month sentence
imposed after he pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm by a
convicted
felon,
924(a)(2)
in
(2012).
violation
Wilson
of
18
U.S.C.
disputes
the
§§ 922(g)(1),
district
court’s
application of a four-level sentencing enhancement for using or
possessing a firearm in connection with other felony offenses—
specifically, possession of controlled substances and possession
with intent to distribute controlled substances.
Finding no
error, we affirm.
We review the district court’s factual determinations in
applying
the
error.
United
States v. Strieper, 666 F.3d 288, 292 (4th Cir. 2012).
Where a
defendant
Sentencing
“[u]sed
or
Guidelines
possessed
connection
with
another
enhancement
shall
apply.
§ 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) (2015).
for
any
firearm
felony
U.S.
clear
or
offense,”
Sentencing
ammunition
a
in
four-level
Guidelines
Manual
The “in connection with” element is
satisfied “if the firearm facilitated, or had the potential of
facilitating”
the
other
offense,
or
protection or to embolden the actor.”
if
566
F.3d
n.14(A).
160,
162
(4th
Cir.
it
“was
present
for
United States v. Jenkins,
2009);
see
USSG
§
2K2.1
cmt.
Where the other felony is a drug trafficking offense,
a firearm “found in close proximity to drugs, drug-manufacturing
materials,
or
drug
paraphernalia
2
.
.
.
necessarily
has
the
Appeal: 16-4452
Doc: 31
Filed: 03/16/2017
Pg: 3 of 4
potential of facilitating another felony offense.”
F.3d
at
163
(internal
quotation
§ 2K2.1 cmt. n.14(B)).
marks
Jenkins, 566
omitted)
(citing
USSG
This element is not satisfied, however,
where the presence of the firearm is “the result of accident or
coincidence.”
United States v. Blount, 337 F.3d 404, 411 (4th
Cir. 2003) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Wilson
argues
because
unreasonable
applying
that
the
USSG
his
sentence
district
§ 2K2.1(b)(6)(B).
reasonableness,
applying
an
is
court
We
abuse
clearly
review
of
procedurally
a
sentence
discretion
Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 46 (2007).
erred
in
for
standard.
Procedural error
includes improperly calculating the Sentencing Guidelines range.
Id.
Wilson contends that there is no evidence that the firearm
was used in connection with the sale of controlled substances,
specifically
crack
cocaine,
because
the
evidence
was
insufficient to show that he possessed crack cocaine with the
intent
to
distribute
it.
Based
on
the
record
before
us,
however, we conclude that the district court reasonably inferred
that
Wilson
possessed
the
firearm
in
connection
with
drug
trafficking.
Wilson stated that he obtained the firearm for his personal
protection.
The firearm was on his person, loaded, and ready to
fire, and he possessed five plastic baggies containing a total
weight
of
.67
ounces
of
crack
3
cocaine,
six
green
pills
Appeal: 16-4452
Doc: 31
individually
Filed: 03/16/2017
wrapped
in
Pg: 4 of 4
plastic
cigarettes weighing .5 grams.
baggies,
and
three
marijuana
See Jenkins, 566 F.3d at 162-63;
USSG § 2K2.1 cmt. n.14(B).
Further, the court was correct that, because of Wilson’s
criminal history, simple possession would have been treated as a
felony.
The court did not err in determining that the firearm
emboldened Wilson to commit the offense of possession of the
drugs, particularly in a public area.
Therefore, the district
court’s decision to apply the § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) enhancement was
not clearly erroneous.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions
are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?