US v. Quinton Stevenson
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:15-cr-00846-JMC-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. .. [16-4496]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
QUINTON RASHARD STEVENSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg.
J. Michelle Childs, District
February 23, 2017
February 27, 2017
Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James B. Loggins, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greenville,
South Carolina, for Appellant.
Alan Lance Crick, Assistant
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 3
Quinton Rashard Stevenson appeals his within-Guidelines 40month
felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of
18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2012).
On appeal, Stevenson’s counsel
filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
asserting that he found no meritorious issues for appeal but
questioning the length of Stevenson’s sentence.
provided ineffective assistance of counsel.
The Government has
not responded to the Anders brief or the supplemental pro se
record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for
ineffective assistance of counsel, we conclude that those claims
See United States v. Benton, 523 F.3d 424, 435 (4th
We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment.
This court requires that counsel inform Stevenson, in writing,
of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States
for further review.
If Stevenson requests that a petition be
frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to
withdraw from representation.
Pg: 3 of 3
Counsel’s motion must state that
a copy thereof was served on Stevenson.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?