David Jones v. Paul Butler, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion certificate of appealability (Local Rule 22(a)) [999729254-2] Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03142-D. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999852655]. Mailed to: David Jones. [16-6001]

Appeal: 16-6001

Doc: 13

Filed: 06/14/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6001

DAVID EARL JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PAUL G. BUTLER, JR.; WILLIS J. FOWLER; ANTHONY E. RAND;
DERRICK WADSWORTH,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
BEVERLY PERDUE; PATRICK L. MCCRORY,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Dever III,
Chief District Judge. (5:14-ct-03142-D)

Submitted:

May 25, 2016

Decided:

June 14, 2016

Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Earl Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Joseph Finarelli, Special
Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6001

Doc: 13

Filed: 06/14/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
David Earl Jones appeals the district court’s order denying
relief

on

his

42

U.S.C.

§ 1983

(2012)

complaint.

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We

have

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Jones

v. Butler, No. 5:14-ct-03142-D (E.D.N.C. Dec. 15, 2015).

We

deny

of

as

unnecessary

appealability.

Jones’

motion

for

a

certificate

We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

2