US v. Courtney Boyd
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:06-cr-00005-MSD-FBS-3. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999829931]. Mailed to: Courtney Boyd. [16-6014]
Appeal: 16-6014
Doc: 8
Filed: 05/23/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
COURTNEY OMAR BOYD, a/k/a Omar,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (4:06-cr-00005-MSD-FBS-3)
Submitted:
May 18, 2016
Decided:
May 23, 2016
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Courtney Omar Boyd, Appellant Pro Se.
Eric Matthew Hurt,
Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6014
Doc: 8
Filed: 05/23/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Courtney Omar Boyd appeals from the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion to reduce his
sentence.
Our review of the record reveals that the district
court did not err in denying Boyd’s motion.
affirm the district court’s order.
Accordingly, we
United States v. Boyd, No.
4:06-cr-00005-MSD-FBS-3 (E.D. Va. Dec. 18, 2015).
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?