US v. Eugene Johnson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:90-cr-00113-JRS-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999838924]. Mailed to: Eugene Johnson. [16-6017]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6017 Doc: 7 Filed: 06/01/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6017 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. EUGENE JOHNSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior District Judge. (3:90-cr-00113-JRS-1) Submitted: May 26, 2016 Decided: June 1, 2016 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eugene Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Dominick Salvatore Gerace, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Brian R. Hood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6017 Doc: 7 Filed: 06/01/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Eugene Johnson appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Johnson, No. 3:90-cr-00113-JRS- 1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 18, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?