US v. Eugene Johnson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:90-cr-00113-JRS-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999838924]. Mailed to: Eugene Johnson. [16-6017]
Appeal: 16-6017
Doc: 7
Filed: 06/01/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6017
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
EUGENE JOHNSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
James R. Spencer, Senior
District Judge. (3:90-cr-00113-JRS-1)
Submitted:
May 26, 2016
Decided:
June 1, 2016
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eugene Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Dominick Salvatore Gerace, II,
Assistant United States Attorney, Brian R. Hood, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6017
Doc: 7
Filed: 06/01/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Eugene
Johnson
appeals
from
the
district
court’s
order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence
reduction.
error.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.
United States v. Johnson, No. 3:90-cr-00113-JRS-
1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 18, 2015).
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?