Samuel Jackson v. Marla Magana


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-ct-03295-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999902370]. Mailed to: Samuel Jackson. [16-6031]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6031 Doc: 21 Filed: 08/02/2016 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6031 SAMUEL R. JACKSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NURSE MARLA MAGANA; DR. ROBERT OWENS; DR. ELIZABETH BYRD, Defendants - Appellees, and SUPERINTENDENT DENNIS DANIELS, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:13-ct-03295-FL) Submitted: July 20, 2016 Decided: August 2, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel R. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Kelly Street Brown, Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, YOUNG MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Appeal: 16-6031 Doc: 21 Filed: 08/02/2016 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-6031 Doc: 21 Filed: 08/02/2016 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Samuel denying R. Jackson relief on his appeals 42 several related orders. U.S.C. the district § 1983 court’s (2012) order complaint and We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction to the extent it challenges the denial of Jackson’s request for a temporary restraining order. See Virginia v. Tenneco, Inc., 538 F.2d 1026, 1029–30 (4th Cir. 1976) (observing that orders granting or denying temporary restraining order are not generally claims, we appealable). have reviewed With the respect record and to Jackson’s find no other reversible error; thus, we affirm the district court’s orders as to these claims for the reasons stated by the district court. Magana, dispense No. 5:13-ct-03295-FL with contentions are oral argument adequately (E.D.N.C. because presented in Nov. the the Jackson v. 24, 2015). We facts and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?