US v. Robert Goin
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:12-cr-00669-RBH-3. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999824717]. Mailed to: R. Goins. [16-6038]
Appeal: 16-6038
Doc: 9
Filed: 05/17/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6038
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ROBERT EARL GOINS, a/k/a Robert Earl,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:12-cr-00669-RBH-3)
Submitted:
April 4, 2016
Decided:
May 17, 2016
Before KING, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Earl Goins, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham,
Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina,
Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia,
South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6038
Doc: 9
Filed: 05/17/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Robert
Earl
Goins
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction
of sentence.
error.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly,
we
affirm
the
district
court’s
order.
United States v. Goins, No. 4:12-cr-00669-RBH-3 (D.S.C. Dec. 29,
2015); see United States v. Brown, 653 F.3d 337, 340 (4th Cir.
2011).
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?