US v. Steve Dia
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:04-cr-00259-HEH-2 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999829872]. Mailed to: Steve Dias FCI HERLONG FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 800 Herlong, CA 96113-0800. [16-6042]
Appeal: 16-6042
Doc: 7
Filed: 05/23/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6042
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
STEVE DIAS, a/k/a Troy, a/k/a O’Neil Guthrie,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:04-cr-00259-HEH-2)
Submitted:
May 18, 2016
Decided:
May 23, 2016
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steve Dias, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Arthur Garnett, Katherine
Lee
Martin,
Assistant United
States
Attorneys,
Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6042
Doc: 7
Filed: 05/23/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Steve Dias appeals the district court’s order denying his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence.
We
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
United States v. Diaz, No. 3:04-cr-00259-HEH-2 (E.D. Va.
Nov. 18, 2015); see United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304-05
(4th Cir. 2013) (reviewing disposition of a § 3582(c)(2) motion
for
abuse
of
discretion).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?