Joseph Brown v. Charles Ratledge

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to expedite decision [999759127-2] Originating case number: 7:15-cv-00640-EKD-RSB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999937208]. Mailed to: Joseph Brown. [16-6082]

Appeal: 16-6082

Doc: 12

Filed: 09/28/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6082

JOSEPH A. BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHARLES RATLEDGE, Warden-USP Lee,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Elizabeth K. Dillon, District
Judge. (7:15-cv-00640-EKD-RSB)

Submitted:

August 29, 2016

Decided:

September 28, 2016

Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph A. Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6082

Doc: 12

Filed: 09/28/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Joseph
dismissing

A.

Brown

without

appeals

prejudice

the

his

district

complaint

court’s

filed

order

pursuant

to

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971), for failure to comply with a court order.
We

have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Brown v. Ratledge, No. 7:15-cv-00640-EKD-RSD (W.D. Va.

Dec. 18, 2015).
appeal.
legal
before

We deny as moot Brown’s motion to expedite his

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

2