Dontay Carter-El v. Scott S. Oakley

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-02545-JFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999918772]. Mailed to: Dontay Carter-El LEA COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 6900 West Millen Drive Hobbs, NM 88244. [16-6093]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6093 Doc: 12 Filed: 08/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6093 DONTAY CARTER-EL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SCOTT S. OAKLEY; ROBIN WOOLFORD; LENORA ADEGBESAN; PAULA WILLIAMS; WARDEN FRANK BISHOP; LT. BRAD WILT; WARDEN RICHARD GRAHAM, JR.; JAMES TICHNELL, Case Manager; CAPT. BUTLER, Investigations, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-02545-JFM) Submitted: August 25, 2016 Decided: August 29, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dontay Carter-El, Appellant Pro Se. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Appellees. Ankush Nayar, OFFICE OF THE Baltimore, Maryland, for Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6093 Doc: 12 Filed: 08/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Dontay denying Carter-El relief on his appeals 42 the U.S.C. district § 1983 court’s (2012) orders complaint and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carter-El v. Oakley, 1:14-cv-02545-JFM (D. Md. filed Nov. 10, 2015 & entered Nov. 12, 2015; filed Jan. 11, 2016 & entered Jan. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?