Michael James v. Daniel Cotter
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion to appoint/assign counsel denied [999871410-2] Originating case number: 9:14-cv-04518-TLW. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999925052]. Mailed to: Michael D. James. [16-6110]
Appeal: 16-6110
Doc: 15
Filed: 09/08/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6110
MICHAEL D. JAMES,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DANIEL COTTER, Perry CI Contraband Sgt; D. BURCINSKI,
Contraband Cpl; S. DUFFY, Administrative Captain, Perry CI,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort.
Terry L. Wooten, Chief District
Judge. (9:14-cv-04518-TLW)
Submitted:
August 3, 2016
Decided:
September 8, 2016
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael D. James, Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade, DOYLE,
O’ROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, PA, Anderson, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6110
Doc: 15
Filed: 09/08/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Michael D. James seeks to appeal the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting
summary judgment to defendants, and dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust
administrative remedies.
Upon review, we vacate the district
court’s order and remand the case with instructions to allow
James a reasonable time to exhaust his administrative remedies
and then, if necessary, move to amend his complaint.
We deny
James’ motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?