US v. Andrew Jackson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to void judgment [999745835-2] Originating case number: 3:00-cr-00006-JPB-RWT-1,3:00-cr-00046-JPB-RWT-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999830083]. Mailed to: Jackson. [16-6119]

Appeal: 16-6119

Doc: 8

Filed: 05/23/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6119

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANDREW CHARLES JACKSON, a/k/a William Benbow, a/k/a Ricky
Antonio Bady, a/k/a Sway,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,
District Judge.
(3:00-cr-00006-JPB-RWT-1; 3:00-cr-00046-JPBRWT-1)

Submitted:

May 18, 2016

Decided:

May 23, 2016

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrew Charles Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.
Paul Thomas
Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6119

Doc: 8

Filed: 05/23/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Andrew Charles Jackson appeals the district court’s order
denying his “motion to void and correct illegal sentence.”
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

United States v. Jackson, Nos. 3:00-cr-00006-JPB-RWT-1;

3:00-cr-00046-JPB-RWT-1
Jackson’s

motion

to

(N.D.W.

void

Va.

judgment

Jan.
and

we

4,

2016).

We

deny

dispense

with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2