Michael Alonza Rufus v. US

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 6:15-cv-02127-MBS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999881367]. Mailed to: Rufus. [16-6120]

Appeal: 16-6120

Doc: 5

Filed: 07/07/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6120

MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville.
Margaret B. Seymour, Senior
District Judge. (6:15-cv-02127-MBS)

Submitted:

June 29, 2016

Decided:

July 7, 2016

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Alonza Rufus, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6120

Doc: 5

Filed: 07/07/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Michael
accepting

Alonza

the

Rufus

appeals

recommendation

the

§ 2241

court’s

magistrate

(2012)

judge

petition

order
and

his

prejudice.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

without

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.
MBS

U.S.C.

of

district

dismissing

error.

28

the

(D.S.C.

Jan.

See Rufus v. United States, No. 6:15-cv-021274,

2016).

We

dispense

with

oral

argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2