US v. Wendell Johnson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:04-cr-00128-MFU-1, 7:16-cv-80882-MFU-RSB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999871236]. Mailed to: Wendell Antonio Johnson. [16-6144]

Appeal: 16-6144

Doc: 5

Filed: 06/28/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6144

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
WENDELL ANTONIO JOHNSON,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District
Judge. (7:04-cr-00128-MFU-1; 7:16-cv-80882-MFU-RSB)

Submitted:

June 23, 2016

Decided:

June 28, 2016

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wendell Antonio Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia,
Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke,
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6144

Doc: 5

Filed: 06/28/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Wendell

Antonio

Johnson

seeks

to

appeal

the

district

court’s order dismissing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a
second

or

successive

without authorization.

28

U.S.C.

§ 2255

(2012)

motion

filed

On appeal, we confine our review to the

issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.

See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

Because Johnson’s informal brief does not challenge the basis
for

the

district

court’s

disposition,

appellate review of the court’s order.
the district court’s judgment.

Johnson

has

forfeited

Accordingly, we affirm

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2