US v. Armando Garcia-Cabrera
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:04-cr-00301-F-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999801319]. Mailed to: Armando Garcia-Cabrera. [16-6168]
Appeal: 16-6168
Doc: 8
Filed: 04/22/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6168
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ARMANDO GARCIA-CABRERA,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:04-cr-00301-F-1)
Submitted:
April 19, 2016
Decided:
April 22, 2016
Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Armando Garcia-Cabrera, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6168
Doc: 8
Filed: 04/22/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Armando Garcia-Cabrera appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2012) motion.
record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the
Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. GarciaCabrera, No. 5:04-cr-00301-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 13, 2016).
We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?