US v. Armando Garcia-Cabrera

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:04-cr-00301-F-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999801319]. Mailed to: Armando Garcia-Cabrera. [16-6168]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6168 Doc: 8 Filed: 04/22/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6168 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ARMANDO GARCIA-CABRERA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:04-cr-00301-F-1) Submitted: April 19, 2016 Decided: April 22, 2016 Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Armando Garcia-Cabrera, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6168 Doc: 8 Filed: 04/22/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Armando Garcia-Cabrera appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2012) motion. record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. GarciaCabrera, No. 5:04-cr-00301-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 13, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?