Bryan Richardson v. Mr. Smith
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for appropriate relief [999816293-2]. Originating case number: 2:14-cv-00064-JPB-MJA. Copies to all parties and the district court. . Mailed to: Bryan Richardson. [16-6172]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
BRYAN KEITH RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
MR. SMITH, Associate Warden of Prison Operations; MR.
RUSSELL A. PERDUE, Warden of the Entire Prison; MR. YARBER,
Lieutenant of the SIS Department; MR.
YEAGER, A Federal
Employee at the Camp; MS. PARK-DAVISON, Unit Manager of
Building A.; MR.
WEAVER, Health Service Administrator of
the Prison; MR. CLARK, Education Supervisor at the Prison;
MR. BECK, Prison Education Specialist; MS.
Educational/Teacher at the Prison; COUNSELOR C TAYLOR,
Counsel for Unit A-3 at the Prison; DOES 1 THROUGH 8, BOP
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins.
John Preston Bailey,
District Judge. (2:14-cv-00064-JPB-MJA)
August 26, 2016
Before KING, SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
September 13, 2016
Pg: 2 of 3
Bryan Keith Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Erin K. Reisenweber,
Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia,
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
Bryan Keith Richardson appeals the district court’s order
adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge
and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v.
Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons
2:14-cv-00064-JPB-MJA (N.D. W. Va. Jan. 20, 2016).
we find that Richardson’s requests for discovery were properly
denied because the evidence sought for discovery would not have
created a genuine issue of material fact sufficient to defeat
See Ingle ex re. Ingle v. Yelton, 439 F.3d
appropriate relief and dispense with oral argument because the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?