US v. Michael Alonza Rufu


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:02-cr-00550-MBS-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999883703]. Mailed to: Michael Rufus. [16-6181]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6181 Doc: 6 Filed: 07/11/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6181 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (3:02-cr-00550-MBS-1) Submitted: June 30, 2016 Decided: July 11, 2016 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Alonza Rufus, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Acting United States Attorney, William Kenneth Witherspoon, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6181 Doc: 6 Filed: 07/11/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Michael Alonza Rufus appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a writ of error coram nobis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2012). no reversible court’s order. error. We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, we affirm the district See United States v. Rufus, No. 3:02-cr-00550- MBS-1 (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?