US v. Ismael Amestica
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cr-00119-RBS-RJK-2. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency . Mailed to: Ismael Diaz Amestica. [16-6185]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
ISMAEL DIAZ AMESTICA, a/k/a Fidel Ramos Ramos,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:14-cr-00119-RBS-RJK-2)
June 23, 2016
June 28, 2016
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ismael Diaz Amestica, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell,
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion to compel a sentence
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
See United States v. Amestica, No. 2:14-cr-
00119-RBS-RJK-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 27, 2016).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?