US v. Ismael Amestica


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cr-00119-RBS-RJK-2. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999871245]. Mailed to: Ismael Diaz Amestica. [16-6185]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6185 Doc: 8 Filed: 06/28/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6185 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ISMAEL DIAZ AMESTICA, a/k/a Fidel Ramos Ramos, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:14-cr-00119-RBS-RJK-2) Submitted: June 23, 2016 Decided: June 28, 2016 Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ismael Diaz Amestica, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6185 Doc: 8 Filed: 06/28/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Ismael Diaz Amestica appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion to compel a sentence reduction. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Amestica, No. 2:14-cr- 00119-RBS-RJK-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?