US v. Floyd Powell

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:99-cr-00012-RLV-6,5:15-cv-00092-RLV Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999863071]. Mailed to: Floyd Junior Powell. [16-6220]

Appeal: 16-6220

Doc: 9

Filed: 06/22/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6220

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
FLOYD JUNIOR POWELL, a/k/a Dick,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville.
Richard L.
Voorhees, District Judge.
(5:99-cr-00012-V-6; 5:15-cv-00092RLV)

Submitted:

June 16, 2016

Decided:

June 22, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Floyd Junior Powell, Appellant Pro Se.
Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6220

Doc: 9

Filed: 06/22/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Floyd

Junior

Powell

appeals

the

district

court’s

denying his post-judgment motion for recusal as moot.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

order

We have

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

See

United States v. Powell, No. 5:15-cv-00092-RLV (W.D.N.C. Jan.
19, 2016).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

2