US v. Naarl Richard

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:09-cr-00992-PMD-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999873214]. Mailed to: Appellant. [16-6232]

Appeal: 16-6232

Doc: 6

Filed: 06/29/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6232

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
NAARL JOSEPH RICHARD, a/k/a Noel H. Richard, a/k/a Richard
Earl, a/k/a Richard Narrl,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston.
Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior
District Judge. (2:09-cr-00992-PMD-1)

Submitted:

June 23, 2016

Decided:

June 29, 2016

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Naarl Joseph Richard, Appellant Pro Se.
Nathan S. Williams,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6232

Doc: 6

Filed: 06/29/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Naarl

Joseph

Richard

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

United States v. Richard, No. 2:09-cr-00992-PMD-1 (D.S.C.

Jan. 29, 2016).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

2