US v. Antonio Nicholson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:07-cr-00045-FL-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999838990]. Mailed to: Antonio Nicholson. [16-6241]

Appeal: 16-6241

Doc: 7

Filed: 06/01/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6241

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANTONIO LAMONT NICHOLSON,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:07-cr-00045-FL-1)

Submitted:

May 26, 2016

Decided:

June 1, 2016

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit
Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Lamont Nicholson, Appellant Pro Se.
Barbara Dickerson
Kocher,
Assistant
United
States
Attorney,
Raleigh,
North
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6241

Doc: 7

Filed: 06/01/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Antonio Lamont Nicholson appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence
reduction.
error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Contrary

to

Nicholson’s

assertion

on

appeal,

our

decision in United States v. Williams, 808 F.3d 253 (4th Cir.
2015), does not apply.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court.

United States v. Nicholson, No.

5:07-cr-00045-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 25, 2016).
oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with
contentions
this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2