Tommy Owens v. Earl Butler
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-ct-03033-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000038034]. Mailed to: T Owens. [16-6250]
Appeal: 16-6250
Doc: 27
Filed: 03/08/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6250
TOMMY OWENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EARL M. BUTLER, Sheriff; CHIEF DEPUTY SHERIFF WRIGHT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:15-ct-03033-FL)
Submitted:
October 28, 2016
Before MOTZ and
Circuit Judge.
FLOYD,
Circuit
Decided:
Judges,
and
March 8, 2017
HAMILTON,
Senior
Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tommy Owens, Appellant Pro Se.
Ronnie Monroe Mitchell,
CUMBERLAND
COUNTY
SHERIFF’S
OFFICE,
Fayetteville,
North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6250
Doc: 27
Filed: 03/08/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Tommy
relief
Owens
on
his
reviewed
the
material
appeals
42
fact
U.S.C.
record
and
exists
correctly
entitled
to
held
district
(2012)
conclude
that
order
complaint.
a
whether
genuine
Owens
denying
We
have
dispute
exhausted
of
his
However, we conclude that the district
in
qualified
court’s
§ 1983
regarding
administrative remedies.
court
the
the
alternative
immunity.
See
that
United
Defendants
States
ex
are
rel.
Drakeford v. Tuomey, 792 F.3d 364, 375 (4th Cir. 2015) (“[W]e
may affirm a district court’s ruling on any ground apparent in
the record.”)
and
modify
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order
the
order
to
reflect
a
dismissal
with
prejudice.
Owens v. Butler, No. 5:15-ct-03033-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 9, 2016).
We
dispense
contentions
with
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?