Charles Langham v. US

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999782744-2] Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03143-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999965304]. Mailed to: Charles Langham FMC BUTNER FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER P. O. Box 1600 Butner, NC 27509-0000. [16-6252]

Appeal: 16-6252

Doc: 16

Filed: 11/09/2016

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6252

CHARLES LANGHAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; LT. R. WRIGHT; ANGELA DUNBAR;
OFFICER STOOTS; OFFICER MALONE; OFFICER BOYD; PHYSICIAN
ASSISTANT SCOTT; MR. DUVALL, Psychologist; LIEUTENANT CHASE;
TINA SCOTT; RENE DAUBON,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
ERIC HOLDER, Attorney General,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:14-ct-03143-BO)

Submitted:

October 18, 2016

Decided:

November 9, 2016

Before TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 16-6252

Doc: 16

Filed: 11/09/2016

Pg: 2 of 3

Charles Langham, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert J. Dodson, Special
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 16-6252

Doc: 16

Filed: 11/09/2016

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Charles Langham appeals the district court’s order granting
summary

judgment

to

Defendants

and

denying

relief

on

his

complaint raising claims pursuant to the Federal Torts Claim Act
(FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680 (2012), and Bivens v.
Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.
388 (1971).
error.
in

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, although we grant Langham leave to proceed

forma

pauperis,

we

affirm

the

district

court’s

order.

Langham v. United States, No. 5:14-ct-03143-BO (E.D.N.C. filed
Jan. 27, 2016 & entered Jan. 28, 2016).

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3