Cornelius Yohe, Jr. v. Captain Owen


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03315-FL. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999801176]. Mailed to: Appellant. [16-6259]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6259 Doc: 17 Filed: 04/22/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6259 CORNELIUS ERNIE YOHE, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAPTAIN OWENS; DENISE HOOKER; TOMMY L. PAGE, JR.; ZEB T. HEATH, JR., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-ct-03315-FL) Submitted: April 19, 2016 Decided: April 22, 2016 Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cornelius Ernie Yohe, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kari Russwurm Johnson, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6259 Doc: 17 Filed: 04/22/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Cornelius Ernie Yohe, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying in part his pretrial motion requesting that the court provide certain documents. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). is neither a final collateral order. jurisdiction. order nor The order Yohe seeks to appeal an appealable interlocutory or Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?