Cornelius Yohe, Jr. v. Captain Owen
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03315-FL. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999801176]. Mailed to: Appellant. [16-6259]
Appeal: 16-6259
Doc: 17
Filed: 04/22/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6259
CORNELIUS ERNIE YOHE, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAPTAIN OWENS; DENISE HOOKER; TOMMY L. PAGE, JR.; ZEB T. HEATH,
JR.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:14-ct-03315-FL)
Submitted:
April 19, 2016
Decided:
April 22, 2016
Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cornelius Ernie Yohe, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Kari Russwurm
Johnson, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6259
Doc: 17
Filed: 04/22/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Cornelius Ernie Yohe, Jr., seeks to appeal the district
court’s order denying in part his pretrial motion requesting that
the court provide certain documents.
This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and
certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292
(2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
is
neither
a
final
collateral order.
jurisdiction.
order
nor
The order Yohe seeks to appeal
an
appealable
interlocutory
or
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?