Bart Fitzgerald McClain v. NC Department of Public Safety
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:16-ct-03009-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999873523]. Mailed to: McClain. [16-6260]
Appeal: 16-6260
Doc: 11
Filed: 06/29/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6260
BART FITZGERALD MCCLAIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; COLUMBUS
CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; PAT MCCRORY; FRANK PERRY; GEORGE
SOLOMON; OFFICER LOCKLEAR; NORA HUNT; JENNIFER WALSH; CAPTAIN
EVANS; CAPTAIN PREIST; SERGEANT HARRIS; SERGEANT FRANK; PRISON
ATTENDANT FRITZE; PRISON ATTENDANT NOBLES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:16-ct-03009-FL)
Submitted:
June 23, 2016
Decided:
June 29, 2016
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bart Fitzgerald McClain, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6260
Doc: 11
Filed: 06/29/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Bart Fitzgerald McClain seeks to appeal the district court’s
order of February 5, 2016, denying McClain’s motion to appoint
counsel and for a subpoena.
This court may exercise jurisdiction
only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.
R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S.
541, 545-46 (1949).
The order McClain seeks to appeal is neither
a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?