Bart Fitzgerald McClain v. NC Department of Public Safety

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:16-ct-03009-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999873523]. Mailed to: McClain. [16-6260]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6260 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6260 BART FITZGERALD MCCLAIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; COLUMBUS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; PAT MCCRORY; FRANK PERRY; GEORGE SOLOMON; OFFICER LOCKLEAR; NORA HUNT; JENNIFER WALSH; CAPTAIN EVANS; CAPTAIN PREIST; SERGEANT HARRIS; SERGEANT FRANK; PRISON ATTENDANT FRITZE; PRISON ATTENDANT NOBLES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:16-ct-03009-FL) Submitted: June 23, 2016 Decided: June 29, 2016 Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bart Fitzgerald McClain, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6260 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Bart Fitzgerald McClain seeks to appeal the district court’s order of February 5, 2016, denying McClain’s motion to appoint counsel and for a subpoena. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order McClain seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?