US v. Randall Conrad
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:04-cr-00297-NCT-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999914286]. Mailed to: R Conrad. [16-6264]
Appeal: 16-6264
Doc: 13
Filed: 08/22/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6264
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
RANDALL LEE CONRAD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.
N. Carlton Tilley,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:04-cr-00297-NCT-1)
Submitted:
August 18, 2016
Decided:
August 22, 2016
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randall Lee Conrad, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton,
Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6264
Doc: 13
Filed: 08/22/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Randall
denying
his
Lee
Conrad
motion
for
appeals
a
the
sentence
district
reduction
court’s
pursuant
order
to
18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012).
We have reviewed the record and
find
Accordingly,
no
reversible
error.
reasons stated by the district court.
No.
1:04-cr-00297-NCT-1
Jan. 12, 2016).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We
(M.D.N.C.
dispense
we
oral
Jan.
11
argument
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
for
the
United States v. Conrad,
filed
with
affirm
&
because
presented
would
entered
not
the
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?