US v. Randall Conrad

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:04-cr-00297-NCT-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999914286]. Mailed to: R Conrad. [16-6264]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6264 Doc: 13 Filed: 08/22/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6264 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. RANDALL LEE CONRAD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:04-cr-00297-NCT-1) Submitted: August 18, 2016 Decided: August 22, 2016 Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randall Lee Conrad, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6264 Doc: 13 Filed: 08/22/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Randall denying his Lee Conrad motion for appeals a the sentence district reduction court’s pursuant order to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, no reversible error. reasons stated by the district court. No. 1:04-cr-00297-NCT-1 Jan. 12, 2016). facts and materials legal before We (M.D.N.C. dispense we oral Jan. 11 argument contentions are adequately this and argument court for the United States v. Conrad, filed with affirm & because presented would entered not the in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?