Norman Wilkerson v. County of Chesterfield


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for leave to file [999867141-2]; denying Motion for stay pending appeal [999801545-2]; denying Motion for bail/release pending appeal (Local Rule 9(a) and (b)) [999801545-3]; denying Motion to consolidate case (Local Rule 12(b)) [999795650-2]; denying Motion for other relief [999795650-3], denying Motion for other relief [999777532-2] Originating case number: 2:15-cv-00531-RBS-DEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999913557]. Mailed to: appellant. [16-6269]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6269 Doc: 24 Filed: 08/19/2016 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6269 NORMAN KEVIN WILKERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD; CHESTERFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT; CHESTERFIELD COUNTY COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY OFFICE; CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE; WILLIAM DAVENPORT, Commonwealth Attorney; THOMAS MCKENNA, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney; LURA KHAWAYA, Prosecution Attorney; BARBARA COOKE, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney; CHRIS HUMPHRIES, Detective; THOMAS KLINE, Detective; SHANNON L. TAYLOR; THIERRY DUPUS, Chief of the Chesterfield County Police Department; TIMOTHY RING, Captain of the Chesterfield County Police Department; RUBEN GREEN; RYAN SPELTZ; JAMES BODIE; STEVEN L. MICAS, Chesterfield County Attorney, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:15-cv-00531-RBS-DEM) Submitted: July 27, 2016 Decided: August 19, 2016 Before KEENAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Appeal: 16-6269 Doc: 24 Filed: 08/19/2016 Pg: 2 of 3 Norman Kevin Wilkerson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-6269 Doc: 24 Filed: 08/19/2016 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Norman Kevin Wilkerson appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wilkerson v. Cty. No. 2:15-cv- 00531-RBS-DEM (E.D. Va. Feb. 23, 2016; Jan. 28, 2016). We deny Wilkerson’s pending motions. of Chesterfield, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?