US v. David Lightner

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:93-cr-00133-FDW-2. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999900943]. Mailed to: David Fitzgerald Lightner. [16-6286]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6286 Doc: 5 Filed: 08/01/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6286 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAVID FITZGERALD LIGHTNER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:93-cr-00133-FDW-2) Submitted: July 28, 2016 Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge. HARRIS, Decided: Circuit Judges, and August 1, 2016 DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Fitzgerald Lightner, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6286 Doc: 5 Filed: 08/01/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: David Fitzgerald Lightner appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lightner, No. 3:93-cr-00133-FDW-2 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 9, 2016). oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before We dispense with contentions this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?