US v. David Lightner
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:93-cr-00133-FDW-2. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999900943]. Mailed to: David Fitzgerald Lightner. [16-6286]
Appeal: 16-6286
Doc: 5
Filed: 08/01/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6286
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVID FITZGERALD LIGHTNER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (3:93-cr-00133-FDW-2)
Submitted:
July 28, 2016
Before MOTZ and
Circuit Judge.
HARRIS,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
August 1, 2016
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Fitzgerald Lightner, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6286
Doc: 5
Filed: 08/01/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
David
Fitzgerald
Lightner
appeals
the
district
court’s
order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion
for reduction of sentence.
no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court.
United States v. Lightner, No.
3:93-cr-00133-FDW-2 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 9, 2016).
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with
contentions
this
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?