Carlton Clay v. Carl Mani
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:16-cv-00036-AWA-LRL. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999953399]. Mailed to: Carlton Clay. [16-6315]
Appeal: 16-6315
Doc: 12
Filed: 10/24/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6315
CARLTON CLAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CARL MANIS, Warden/Administrator; J.A. HARMON, Institutional
Hearing Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Arenda L. Wright Allen,
District Judge. (2:16-cv-00036-AWA-LRL)
Submitted:
October 19, 2016
Decided:
October 24, 2016
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carlton Clay, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6315
Doc: 12
Filed: 10/24/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Carlton Clay appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)
(2012).
error.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.
(E.D.
Va.
Feb.
See Clay v. Manis, No. 2:16-cv-00036-AWA-LRL
16,
2016).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?