US v. Robin Slagle

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999782956-2]. Originating case number: 3:14-cr-00058-GMG-RWT-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999907692]. Mailed to: Robin Slagle. [16-6319]

Appeal: 16-6319

Doc: 10

Filed: 08/10/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6319

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ROBIN A. SLAGLE,
Petitioner – Appellant,
TIMOTHY JAMES FISHER,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief
District Judge. (3:14-cr-00058-GMG-RWT-1)

Submitted:

August 9, 2016

Decided:

August 10, 2016

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robin A. Slagle, Appellant Pro Se.
Paul Thomas Camilletti,
Assistant United States Attorney, Anna Zartler Krasinski, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Martinsburg, West Virginia;
Lynette Danae DeMasi-Lemon, Assistant United States Attorney,
Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6319

Doc: 10

Filed: 08/10/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Robin A. Slagle appeals the district court’s order denying
as untimely her third-party objection to forfeiture.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We have

Accordingly,

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court.

United States v.

Fisher, No. 3:14-cr-00058-GMG-RWT-1 (N.D. W. Va. Jan. 19, 2016).
We

dispense

contentions

with
are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the

facts

and

the

materials

legal
before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2