Morris Speight-Bey v. Charles William
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00177-IMK-JES Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Morris Speight-Bey. [16-6324]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Petitioner - Appellant,
CHARLES WILLIAMS, Warden, Alien Property Custodian,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg.
Irene M. Keeley,
District Judge. (1:15-cv-00177-IMK-JES)
May 18, 2016
May 23, 2016
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Morris Speight-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.
Helen Campbell Altmeyer,
Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia; Erin K.
Reisenweber, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Morris Speight-Bey seeks to appeal the district court’s order
directing a response to his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. This
court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order SpeightBey seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order.
appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Accordingly, we dismiss the
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?