Morris Speight-Bey v. Charles William

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00177-IMK-JES Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999829948]. Mailed to: Morris Speight-Bey. [16-6324]

Appeal: 16-6324

Doc: 5

Filed: 05/23/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6324

MORRIS SPEIGHT-BEY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
CHARLES WILLIAMS, Warden, Alien Property Custodian,
Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg.
Irene M. Keeley,
District Judge. (1:15-cv-00177-IMK-JES)

Submitted:

May 18, 2016

Decided:

May 23, 2016

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Morris Speight-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.
Helen Campbell Altmeyer,
Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia; Erin K.
Reisenweber, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6324

Doc: 5

Filed: 05/23/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Morris Speight-Bey seeks to appeal the district court’s order
directing a response to his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. This
court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order SpeightBey seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order.
appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Accordingly, we dismiss the

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

DISMISSED

2