Glynndeavin von Fox v. SC Judicial Department

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999789645-2]. Originating case number: 2:16-cv-00209-RMG. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999916294]. Mailed to: Glynndeavin von Fox. [16-6336]

Appeal: 16-6336

Doc: 16

Filed: 08/24/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6336

GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge.
(2:16-cv-00209-RMG)

Submitted:

August 16, 2016

Decided:

August 24, 2016

Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Glynndeavin von Fox, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6336

Doc: 16

Filed: 08/24/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Glynndeavin

von

Fox

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
dismissing his case.
reversible error.

We have reviewed the record and find no

Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma

pauperis on appeal and dismiss von Fox’s appeal for the reasons
stated by the district court.

von Fox v. S.C. Judicial Dep’t, No.

2:16-cv-00209-RMG (D.S.C. Feb. 12, 2016).

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

2