Gregory Smith v. Christopher Phillip

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999798270-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cv-03161-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999838949]. Mailed to: G. Smith, L. Sullivan. [16-6344]

Appeal: 16-6344

Doc: 13

Filed: 06/01/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6344

GREGORY VINCENT SMITH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CHRISTOPHER PHILLIPS; CPL T WILSON, Tick; PEGGY E. SPIVEY;
CRYSTAL HODGE; JIM MATTHEWS,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken.
R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-03161-RBH)

Submitted:

May 26, 2016

Decided:

June 1, 2016

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit
Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Vincent Smith, Appellant Pro Se. H. Thomas Morgan, Jr.,
Larry Shawn Sullivan, DUBOSE-ROBINSON, P.C., Camden, South
Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6344

Doc: 13

Filed: 06/01/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Gregory Vincent Smith appeals the district court’s orders
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief

on

his

42

U.S.C.

§ 1983

reviewed

complaint

reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

facts

and

materials

legal
before

We

and

find

no

Smith v. Phillips, No. 1:14-cv-03161-RBH

(D.S.C. Feb. 2 & Mar. 3, 2016).
counsel.

record

denying

We

assign

the

and

reconsideration.

by the district court.

have

(2012)

dispense

We also deny Smith’s motion to
with

oral

argument

contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

because

presented

would

not

the

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2