Gregory Smith v. Christopher Phillip


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999798270-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cv-03161-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999838949]. Mailed to: G. Smith, L. Sullivan. [16-6344]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6344 Doc: 13 Filed: 06/01/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6344 GREGORY VINCENT SMITH, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CHRISTOPHER PHILLIPS; CPL T WILSON, Tick; PEGGY E. SPIVEY; CRYSTAL HODGE; JIM MATTHEWS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (1:14-cv-03161-RBH) Submitted: May 26, 2016 Decided: June 1, 2016 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gregory Vincent Smith, Appellant Pro Se. H. Thomas Morgan, Jr., Larry Shawn Sullivan, DUBOSE-ROBINSON, P.C., Camden, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6344 Doc: 13 Filed: 06/01/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Gregory Vincent Smith appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 reviewed complaint reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated facts and materials legal before We and find no Smith v. Phillips, No. 1:14-cv-03161-RBH (D.S.C. Feb. 2 & Mar. 3, 2016). counsel. record denying We assign the and reconsideration. by the district court. have (2012) dispense We also deny Smith’s motion to with oral argument contentions are adequately this and argument court because presented would not the in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?