Daniel Brown v. Levern Cohen

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to amend informal brief [999792593-2]. Originating case number: 4:14-cv-03659-BHH. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999873614]. Mailed to: Daniel Brown. [16-6350]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6350 Doc: 6 Filed: 06/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6350 DANIEL BROWN, a/k/a Daniel M. Brown, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN LEVERN COHEN, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (4:14-cv-03659-BHH) Submitted: June 23, 2016 Decided: June 29, 2016 Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Melody Jane Brown, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6350 Doc: 6 Filed: 06/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Daniel Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to alter or amend a prior relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. order denying We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on October 20, 2015. The notice earliest, on March 3, 2016. of appeal was filed, at the Because Brown failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. motion to amend his informal brief. We We deny Brown’s dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?