Daniel Brown v. Levern Cohen
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to amend informal brief [999792593-2]. Originating case number: 4:14-cv-03659-BHH. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999873614]. Mailed to: Daniel Brown. [16-6350]
Appeal: 16-6350
Doc: 6
Filed: 06/29/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6350
DANIEL BROWN, a/k/a Daniel M. Brown,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN LEVERN COHEN,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence.
Bruce H. Hendricks, District
Judge. (4:14-cv-03659-BHH)
Submitted:
June 23, 2016
Decided:
June 29, 2016
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Donald John Zelenka, Senior
Assistant
Attorney
General,
Melody
Jane
Brown,
Assistant
Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6350
Doc: 6
Filed: 06/29/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Daniel Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying
his
motion
to
alter
or
amend
a
prior
relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition.
order
denying
We dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was
not timely filed.
Parties
are
accorded
30
days
after
the
entry
of
the
district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed.
R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the
appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the
appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).
“[T]he timely
filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional
requirement.”
Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
The district court’s order was entered on the docket on
October
20,
2015.
The
notice
earliest, on March 3, 2016.
of
appeal
was
filed,
at
the
Because Brown failed to file a
timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening
of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal.
motion
to
amend
his
informal
brief.
We
We deny Brown’s
dispense
with
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?