Lawrence Lewis v. Unknown

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00556-JAG-RCY Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999894579]. Mailed to: Lawrence Donnell Lewis. [16-6356]

Appeal: 16-6356

Doc: 12

Filed: 07/22/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6356

LAWRENCE DONNELL LEWIS,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
UNKNOWN,
Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
John A. Gibney, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:15-cv-00556-JAG-RCY)

Submitted:

July 21, 2016

Decided:

July 22, 2016

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence Donnell Lewis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6356

Doc: 12

Filed: 07/22/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Donnell Lewis seeks to appeal the district court’s
order dismissing his civil complaint.

This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012),
and

certain

interlocutory

and

collateral

orders,

28

U.S.C.

§ 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan

Corp.,

337

U.S.

541,

545-47

(1949).

Because

the

deficiencies identified by the district court were remedied by
the filing of a consent form, we conclude that the order Lewis
seeks

to

appeal

is

neither

a

final

interlocutory or collateral order.

order

nor

an

appealable

Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid

Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623 (4th Cir. 2015); Domino Sugar
Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67
(4th Cir. 1993).
Accordingly,
jurisdiction.

we

dismiss

the

appeal

for

lack

of

We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional

process.

DISMISSED

2