US v. Dickinson Adionser

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:03-cr-00081-HCM-JEB-1,2:10-cv-00085-HCM-DEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999926012].. [16-6357]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6357 Doc: 7 Filed: 09/09/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6357 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DICKINSON NORMAN ADIONSER, a/k/a D.C. Black, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:03-cr-00081-HCM-JEB-1; 2:10-cv-00085HCM-DEM) Submitted: August 31, 2016 Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge. WYNN, Circuit Decided: Judges, and September 9, 2016 HAMILTON, Senior Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dickinson Norman Adionser, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6357 Doc: 7 Filed: 09/09/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Dickinson Norman Adionser seeks to appeal the district court’s orders advising Adionser that he must, within 30 days, choose between deleting his successive habeas claims from his Rule 60(b) motion or having successive habeas motion. his entire motion treated as a This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The orders Adionser seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?