US v. Phillip William

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:09-cr-00073-TLW-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999873209]. Mailed to: Phillip James Williams. [16-6361]

Appeal: 16-6361

Doc: 7

Filed: 06/29/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6361

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
PHILLIP JAMES WILLIAMS, a/k/a D, a/k/a PJ,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence.
Terry L. Wooten, Chief District
Judge. (4:09-cr-00073-TLW-1)

Submitted:

June 23, 2016

Decided:

June 29, 2016

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Philip James Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley,
Jr., Jimmie Ewing, Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States
Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina; Arthur Bradley Parham,
Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6361

Doc: 7

Filed: 06/29/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Phillip James Williams appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence
reduction under Amendment 780 to the Sentencing Guidelines.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

See United States v. Williams, No. 4:09-cr-00073-TLW-1

(D.S.C. filed Feb. 29, 2016, entered Mar. 1, 2016).

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

this

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2