Darryl Boyd Adkins v. C/O McDonald

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03169-F Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999894497]. Mailed to: Adkins. [16-6362]

Appeal: 16-6362

Doc: 16

Filed: 07/22/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6362

DARRYL BOYD ADKINS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
C/O

MCDONALD; C/O

WHITE,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:14-ct-03169-F)

Submitted:

July 21, 2016

Decided:

July 22, 2016

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darryl Boyd Adkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Vanessa N. Totten,
Assistant
Attorney
General,
Raleigh,
North
Carolina,
for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6362

Doc: 16

Filed: 07/22/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Darryl

Boyd

Adkins

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

granting Defendants’ summary judgment motion in his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) action.
reversible error.

We have reviewed the record and find no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.
(E.D.N.C.

Feb.

23,

Adkins v. McDonald, No. 5:14-ct-03169-F

2016).

We

dispense

with

oral

argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2