US v. George Howard

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:13-cr-00020-MGL-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999915278]. Mailed to: George Howard. [16-6380]

Appeal: 16-6380

Doc: 11

Filed: 08/23/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6380

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
GEORGE EDWARD HOWARD, June,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge.
(7:13-cr-00020-MGL-1)

Submitted:

August 18, 2016

Decided:

August 23, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Edward Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Carrie Fisher Sherard,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-6380

Doc: 11

Filed: 08/23/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
George

Edward

Howard

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying his motion to reconsider its denial of a sentence reduction
under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) and Amendment 782 of the
Sentencing Guidelines.
reversible error.

We have reviewed the record and find no

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

refusal to reconsider.

See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d

233, 234-36 (4th Cir. 2010).

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2