Kevin Leite v. Warden FCI Williamsburg
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999797314-2]; denying Motion to vacate [999797328-2] Originating case number: 0:15-cv-01780-BHH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999919732]. Mailed to: Kevin Leite. [16-6416]
Appeal: 16-6416
Doc: 9
Filed: 08/30/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6416
KEVIN MICHAEL LEITE,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
WARDEN FCI WILLIAMSBURG,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill.
Bruce H. Hendricks, District
Judge. (0:15-cv-01780-BHH)
Submitted:
August 25, 2016
Decided:
August 30, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Michael Leite, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6416
Doc: 9
Filed: 08/30/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Kevin
district
magistrate
(2012)
Michael
court’s
judge
petition.
reversible
Leite,
order
and
federal
accepting
denying
We
error.
a
have
the
relief
reviewed
Accordingly,
prisoner,
appeals
recommendation
on
his
the
although
28
record
we
of
U.S.C.
and
grant
the
the
§ 2241
find
no
leave
to
proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the
district
court.
Leite
v.
Warden
0:15-cv-01780-BHH (D.S.C. Feb. 9, 2016).
to
vacate
the
district
court
order.
FCI
Williamsburg,
No.
We deny Leite’s motion
We
dispense
with
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?