Kevin Leite v. Warden FCI Williamsburg

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999797314-2]; denying Motion to vacate [999797328-2] Originating case number: 0:15-cv-01780-BHH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999919732]. Mailed to: Kevin Leite. [16-6416]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-6416 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/30/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6416 KEVIN MICHAEL LEITE, Petitioner – Appellant, v. WARDEN FCI WILLIAMSBURG, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (0:15-cv-01780-BHH) Submitted: August 25, 2016 Decided: August 30, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin Michael Leite, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-6416 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/30/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Kevin district magistrate (2012) Michael court’s judge petition. reversible Leite, order and federal accepting denying We error. a have the relief reviewed Accordingly, prisoner, appeals recommendation on his the although 28 record we of U.S.C. and grant the the § 2241 find no leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Leite v. Warden 0:15-cv-01780-BHH (D.S.C. Feb. 9, 2016). to vacate the district court order. FCI Williamsburg, No. We deny Leite’s motion We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?