David Glenn Green v. Justin F. Andrew
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999790780-2]. Originating case number: 5:15-cv-00097-FDW. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999937019]. Mailed to: David Glenn Green. [16-6421]
Appeal: 16-6421
Doc: 8
Filed: 09/28/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6421
DAVID GLENN GREEN,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
JUSTIN F. ANDREWS,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville.
Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (5:15-cv-00097-FDW)
Submitted:
September 20, 2016
Decided:
September 28, 2016
Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Glenn Green, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-6421
Doc: 8
Filed: 09/28/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
David Glenn Green appeals from the district court’s order
denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition.
Green contends
that he is no longer a career offender after Johnson v. United
States,
135
S.
Ct.
2551
(2015).
However,
Green
received
mandatory life sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3559(c) (2012).
a
As
such, his sentence was not driven by his career offender status.
While Green contends that he was incorrectly sentenced under
§ 3559(c), we hold that this claim is not cognizable under 28
U.S.C.
§ 2241
Accordingly,
(2012),
although
given
we
the
grant
facts
leave
to
of
Green’s
proceed
pauperis, we affirm the district court’s order.
in
case.
forma
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?